Blog

Can You Ever Love Jimi Hendrix Too Much? The Theater of Music Geekdom

Category: Beer Humor
0 0

Music geekdom is a horrid calamity. You have to largely suffer in private, since who among your friends and loved ones could ever been said that the original Miles Davis Quintet isn’t jazz so much as pure amber distilled into the form of phone, or that the Chicago post-rock scene in the late 1990 s rivaled the grunge vistum in Seattle in the early’ 90 s for its splendour and depth or that no, you can’t go out tonight, you have to go home and listen to the first Faces album on repeat.

Music geekdom explained how a few riffs of guitar can transport you amply back to an afternoon in high school. It is a fever best borne alone.

But this malady gets a full and unabashed airing in a duo of shows that were a part of the the Public Theater’s Under the Radar festival, a 14 -year-old showcase of some of the most wonderful cutting edge theater all over the world.

The two indicates are in a dialog with each other about simply this ailment: being punch drunk, crazily in love with stone n’roll.

Dialog though is an odd word to use here, since that building block of any decent romp is entirely absent from both of these recitals.

The Hendrix Project undoes wordlessly. It is the story of 12 people–kids we would probably call them now, since they are somewhere between the ages of being old-time enough to buy cigarettes but not quite old-time enough to buy booze–who have to come to rafters of Fillmore East in New York City on New Year’s Eve 1969 to watch Jimi Hendrix and his Band of Gypsys tear the ceiling off the place in one of the most fabled concerts in boulder history.

How to Be a Rock Critic is a one humanity show about the antic living for Lester Bangs, the gonzo boulder critic who devised the word “punk,” characterized a generation’s appreciation in music and brought a kind of grab-them-by-the-throat mode of review that the artistry flesh hadn’t really examined before.

Here the words coming spilling out, one on top of the other in a great waving, mainly as flights of fancy on the significance of rock-and-roll stardom, or art, or life.

” Look, there have always been stellars and idols have always been created and the public has always vested them with everything we believe that we don &# x27; t have, because the whole detail of rock& bun is to create imaginations. The whole part of it is myth. And who am I, Lester Bangs, World Famous Rock Critic, to tell you what your illusion is ?” Erik Jensen, as a bravura Bangs, says early on.” Enjoy your splendid illusions. Ultimately being a’ critic’ only symbolizes wanting to inflict your tastes on other beings. It’s a very honest motive: I simply want you to like the same things I like. I need you to like them. Then I will not be alone .”

Both of these shows are acts of cherish, the product of a kind of pure fandom that strays into evangelism for the goals and objectives of their centre. And if you fail to get wise, both displays try harder, like that one friend who thinks you will really like Captain Beefheart if you simply render it one more listen, and this time actually listen.

The Hendrix Project can scarcely be called a play-act. Directed and seen of by Spike Lee traitor Roger Guenveur Smith, it is more of a action fragment while a rock concert comes exploding out of the theater’s speakers.

The 12 gathering members sway to the music, mutedly scream with satisfy, gape at the show in a dazed wonder, mime taking copious amounts of alcohol and drugs and pair off with one another in ever-rotating combinings, with a few of them sneaking off to a windowed chamber behind the balcony to jailer.

It is Dec. 31, 1969, and the’ 60 s are purposing with a thunderclap as soon as the last saloons of” We Gotta Live Together” fade away. In a short sum of hour Hendrix would be dead of anti-retroviral drugs overdose, and that halcyon decade of peace and cherish would give way to a far darker decade of Watergate, Jonestown, Kent State and Three Mile Island.

You will wait in vain for a coherent narrative to words out of The Hendrix Project . It is a co-production with CalArts Center For New Performance and feels a bit like a classroom activity designed to teach students how to move through cavity.

It is as if Smith invited you up to his dormroom to check out this new Hendrix album that will Blow. Your. Mind.

There is no way out until the needle ultimately face-lift off the record player.

How to Be a Rock Critic provides the commentary that The Hendrix Project absence, as Bangs waxes lyrical about what becomes The Stooges so great and why pretty much every other circle or artist you are able like is like a phony purveyor of bullshit.

Rock stellars, Bangs says( while poignantly enough impounding a Jimi Hendrix record) are” like divinities. They frighten us even as we bow before them. And we are therefore build them up and rip them down. We encourage them in their deterioration. It &# x27; s culture cannibalism .”

As someone who, although he would scarcely declare it, attempted to threw the rock-and-roll pundit in the same pantheon as the stone starring, once even climbing on stagecoach with his typewriter and writing a review in real epoch during a J. Geils Band concert, Bangs was guilty of the same kind of cultural self-cannibalism.

Indeed, the answer to the question How to Be a Rock Critic seems to be: booze vodka from the bottle, swallow cough medicine whole, and ingest whatever capsules you can find in your pocket.

The show takes residence in Bangs’ living room, piled high with books and records and cough medicine and beer cans, and Bangs stumbles out on stagecoach asking us to go away. He is just about to finish a review. He changes his recollection and invites us to abide, tossing a got a couple of those beers out to the audience.

It is fair to wish that he hadn’t been so gracious. Even though the show is only 80 hours, it was better feels as if you are caught in the accommodation of a stone geek, hopped up on who knows what as he presses simply one more album you got to hear on you, tells one more fable from life on the road, causes one last-place chestnut about Art and Life and Beauty.

Both of these performances adoration rock-and-roll n’roll, and they enjoy what they desire so sincerely and truly that “youre supposed to” adoration it to, just for their purpose. But at health risks of a Bangian flight of fancy myself, that’s the thing about love–it is personal and idiosyncratic, and it never obligates appreciation to anybody else. And despite some very well prepared music, these participates don’t really either.

Leave a comment